A Logical Consideration of the Arguments Used to Justify the Use of Aborted Fetal Cells in Vaccines
Some
are wondering if the new mRNA COVID v@ ccines by Pfizer & Moderna, like
other v@ ccines, contain aborted human fetal cells. I do not conclusively know
the answer, as the complete list of ingredients has not yet been released to my
knowledge, but according to Dr. Daniel Hinthorn, who was interviewed by Focus
on the Family (12/18) and testified about the approved COVID v@ ccines by
Pfizer & Moderna, “…they are not created from fetal cell lines; however,
often these kinds of v@ ccines are checked in fetal cell lines just to see if
they work…” If it’s true that aborted fetal cells were used for that part, then
I don’t understand how checking the efficacy of these v@ ccines is not
considered part of the process of providing vaccines for the public. The
process, from the very beginning to the injecting of the v@ ccine into the skin
of the recipient, includes safety testing; so if aborted fetal cell lines were
used for safety testing, then aborted babies were indeed involved in the COVID
v@ ccine, even IF cells are not among the ingredients.
This leads to another question: should it matter? I’m not going
to give an answer (it’s not for me to decide for you) but hopefully this will
help you think through some things you may have not yet considered. When I
first learned that v@ ccines are made with aborted human DNA, I dismissed it
until I gave it more thought and discovered I had several misconceptions.
Perhaps you are a pro-lifer who gets v@ ccines - can you relate with believing
any of the rationalizations below? Would you be willing to at least read those?
“BUT THE V@ CCINE
INDUSTRY DIDN’T COERCE OR PERFORM THE ABORTIONS, SO THEY’RE TAKING SOMETHING
BAD AND TURNING IT INTO SOMETHING GOOD, EVEN NOBLE, RIGHT?”
I am under the conviction that the use of DNA from aborted human
babies serves to condone, justify, and incentivize abortions. We’re not talking
about good coming from accidental deaths that couldn’t be prevented; these
aborted deaths are voluntary. We’re talking about scientists who need deaths of
healthy babies, ones of a particular gestational age, who are delivered in
special ways, whose parts are dissected and preserved in distinct ways. The one
who performs the abortion, as well as the other staff, has a conflict of
interest interfering with their influence over the mother’s decision to abort.
On top of the profit from the procedure itself, they are paid to use specific
techniques to kill and remove the child in a manner that will not damage the
organs and tissues needed for the v@ ccine study and preserve it accordingly.
For the WALVAX-2 “ingredient” (a.k.a. aborted human DNA), “they induced labor using
a ‘water bag’ abortion to shorten the delivery time and prevent the death of
the fetus to ensure live intact organs which were immediately sent to the labs
for cell preparation.” (Source: Go to the LifeNews website and search:
Scientists in China Create New Va@ ccines Using Body Parts From Nine Aborted
Babies, 9/9/15) Additionally, according to Dr. C. Ward Kischer, the scientist
must also be present during the abortion because, "in order to sustain 96%
of the cells, the live tissue would need to be preserved within 5 minutes of
the abortion."
THE ARGUMENT: “BUT IT’S
JUST A FEW.”
No. Dr. Stanley Plotkin, v@ ccine developer and “pioneer,”
testified in this deposition that in just ONE report he used 76 aborted fetuses
(summed up at 2 minutes, 32 seconds) (search YouTube for “Stanley Plotkin -
abortion’s for v@ ccines - 2018 deposition” on 11/12/18 (but correctly spell v@
ccines).
On v@ ccine ingredients lists, each letter-number code
represents which number baby DNA was chosen after studying all of the options.
For instance, v@ ccine ingredient RA273 represents: Rubella (R), Abortus (A),
the 27th baby: the lung of a 3 month gestation aborted baby (27), 3rd tissue
explants (3). WALVAX-2 was the 2nd of 9 babies aborted for that study. Cells,
cellular debris, protein, and DNA from aborted babies are identified as RA273,
WALVAX2, PER C6, HEK293, IMR-90, IMR-91, WI 1-26, WI-38, WI-44, MCR-5, HEK-293,
and Lambda.hE1, are found in more than 23 different v@ ccines.
“IT’S A FORM OF ORGAN-DONATION AND THAT IS AN INDISPUTABLY GOOD THING. HOW IS THIS ANY DIFFERENT?” It is not comparable to organ-donation because it is not a voluntary choice on the part of the donor (i.e. baby). In organ-donation: 1) the death of the organ-donor is unable to be prevented, and 2) the donation is a voluntary choice on the part of the donor. Neither is true when it comes to the abortion of healthy babies selected for v@ ccine studies/production. The moral dilemma: is it ethical and does it honor God to take a stand against abortion while simultaneously a) supporting an industry that profits from it and b) willingly using the products (i.e. v@ ccines) made from it?
“BUT LIKE ORGAN-DONATION AND BLOOD INFUSIONS, DNA FROM ABORTED HUMAN BABIES SAVES LIVES, RIGHT?” V@ ccine package inserts state that they have not been tested for carcinogenic, mutagenic, or fertility impairing properties. Pause. That can take a minute to sink in. Not tested for carcinogenic, mutagenic, or fertility impairing properties. The MRC-5 human diploid cell line, for example, is from human DNA aborted in the 1960s. It is an “immortalized” cell line (a.k.a. continuous or abnormal cell) with insertions, deletions, and translocations (i.e. rewritten DNA) and is considered oncogenic (i.e. cancer), containing insertional mutagenesis following DNA integration. Unlike human conception, which is a combination of genes from 2 sources to make a new whole, insertional mutagenesis is a corruption from foreign material. (*I can share a link.)
[*Human fetal DNA integration leads to mutagenesis and is
carcinogenic. Another common v@ ccine ingredient, formaldehyde, is also a
carcinogen and mutagen. The herbicide, glyphosate (a.k.a. Round Up, by
Monsanto), is also a carcinogen that is found to have contaminated multiple v@
ccine ingredients (I can share the pdf). Many v@ ccine side effects include
symptoms that are identical to heavy metal poisoning. Trace amounts of heavy
metals contained in v@ ccines add up to be significant amounts when
administered in multiple v@ ccines given on the same day, or in the same 6
month time period, or 12 month time period, and it overwhelms the body and the
immune system. (Our pediatrician highly recommends the documentary, Trace
Amounts.) The heavy metals cross the blood-brain barrier and enter the brain
and tissues more easily when giving Tylenol, which is commonly recommended for
the low grade fever and soreness of the injection site. Allergies have become
prevalent in our society and v@ ccine ingredients include allergens like egg proteins,
gelatin, baker’s yeast, and latex. V@ ccines contain antigens (virus/disease)
grown on human and animal DNA, and adjuvants (added ingredients), and they
combine to form a dangerous cocktail (or dare I say potion?). The end of
Revelation 18:23 says, “…and all nations were deceived by your sorcery.”
(“Sorcery” from the Greek word ‘pharmakeia’ means: the use or administering of
drugs; poisoning; or sorcery/magical arts.) And John wrote Revelation to warn
us of what we are to expect before the return of Jesus Christ. This will happen
– if not now, then in the future, and it is wise to be on guard against it.]
“WHAT’S DONE IS DONE. WE CAN ONLY MOVE FORWARD BECAUSE WE’RE NOT SAFE WITHOUT V@ CCINES, RIGHT?” Studies on carcinogenic, mutagenic, and fertility-impairing properties are not the only studies that are lacking. Safety studies on pregnant recipients are lacking. Studies on long-term safety are lacking. Safety studies on combinations of v@ ccines (multiple injections) administered in a single appointment are lacking. Safety studies on the compounding effects of all of the v@ ccines in the CDC schedule administered at the recommended ages are lacking. Scientific studies with double-blind, inert placebos are lacking. Third-party experimentation with no conflict of interest is lacking. What’s worse is that accountability for v@ ccine safety is lacking: The 1986 National Childhood V@ ccine Injury Act (NCVIA) prevented the v@ ccine industry from being sued directly by the public for v@ ccine injury. So the National V@ ccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) was set up as a federal "no-fault" system which, since 1988, has paid out over 4 billion dollars in v@ ccine injury compensation. This “no-fault” system had one condition, established by the Mandate for Safer Childhood V@ ccine clause in December 1987: it legally required the Department of Health and Human Services to submit to Congress biennial reports which are to include detailed Improvements in v@ ccine safety. No such reports have ever been submitted – not once in 30+ years (I can share the link.)
PROS OUTWEIGH THE CONS? SACRIFICE “FEW” FOR THE MASSES? It is my conviction that sacrificing a human life via abortion IS able to be justified (forgiven) by the blood of Jesus but is unable to be justified (made honorable) by good motives, even if it’s in attempt to promote health for the masses. (I say “attempt” because the evidence convinces me v@ ccines do not promote health but actually damage the immune system of the masses, even if the symptoms don’t appear until later and appear in the form of allergies, autoimmune disease, infertility, cancer, Alzheimer’s, etc.)
No comments:
Post a Comment